Mark Steyn on the lessons from the Sir Salman uproar

Writing at the OC Register (which surprised me, because his usual Sunday venue is the Chicago Sun Times), Mark Steyn weighs in on the lessons the British government hasn’t learned either from America’s run-ins with Iran in 1979, which set the world up for the equally teachable moment when Sir Salman’s had his first public nexus with radical Islam. I’ve highlighted the language that, for me, sums up all of the problems we’re having with a violent subculture that has norms and demands completely antithetical to the Western Civilization we’ve so carefully and painfully developed over the past centuries:

So many of our problems with Iran today arise from not doing anything about our problems with Iran yesterday. Men like Ayatollah Khomeini despised pan-Arab nationalists like Nasser who attempted to impose a local variant of Marxism on the Muslim world. Khomeini figured: Why import the false ideologies of a failing civilization? Doesn’t it make more sense to export Islamism to the dying West?

And, for a guy dismissed by most of us as crazy, Khomeini made a lot of sense. The Rushdie fatwa established the ground rules: The side that means it gets away with it. Mobs marched through Britain calling for the murder of a British subject – and, as a matter of policy on the grounds of multicultural sensitivity, the British police shrugged and looked the other way.

One reader in England recalled one demonstration at which he asked a constable why the “Muslim community leaders” weren’t being arrested for incitement to murder. The officer told him to “f— off, or I’ll arrest you.” Genuine “moderate Muslims” were cowed into silence, and pseudo-moderate Muslims triangulated with artful evasiveness. Sir Iqbal Sacranie, who went on to become leader of the most prominent British Muslim lobby group, mused about the Rushdie fatwa: “Death is perhaps too easy.”

In 1989 Salman Rushdie went into hiding under the protection of the British police. A decade later he decided he did not wish to live his life like that and emerged from seclusion to live a more or less normal life. He learned the biggest lesson of all – how easy it is to be forced into the shadows. That’s what’s happening in the free world incrementally every day, with every itsy-bitsy nothing concession to groups who take offense at everything and demand the right to kill you for every offense. Across two decades, what happened to Rushdie has metastasized, in part because of the weak response in those first months. “Death is perhaps too easy”? Maybe. But slow societal suicide is easier still.

Yeah. What he said.

UPDATE: If you’re caught in a tangle of cultural relativism about Iran (“Oh, they should entitled to stand up for their beliefs, as should their minions, stooges and satellites all over the world”) Michelle Malkin, in concert with other bloggers, has a photo journal of the way in which Iran so often manifests its beliefs — painful, humiliating and bloody crackdowns against its own citizens. Interestingly enough, while everyone is willing to castigate America for Abu Ghraib and Gitmo, two anomalous American situations, you don’t hear a peep from the usual whiny crowd about Iran’s bad little habits. Could be because, in criticizing the first, you get fame and adulation; in criticizing the second, you get dead.

5 Responses

  1. But you have to love the fact that they made him Sir Salman anyway…

    Which is not quite, but is very nearly as good as saying: “Screw you!” to the mullahs.

  2. Could be because, in criticizing the first, you get fame and adulation; in criticizing the second, you get dead.

    Could be because they aren’t interested in fighting evil, just the good in the United States. I wonder why.

  3. The only shadows we should be in are the shadows of the corpses of our enemies piled sky high all around us.

  4. The Brits an Americans maybe slowly learning.If you historically treated a people condescendingly(not that this had ever happened . . . I’m just saying if) they have a habit of turning around and biting you in the ass.OUCH !

  5. The problem is not American or British condescension, European colonialism, Western decadence, nor the Jews.

    The problem is Islam.

    For nearly fourteen centuries, the Source and Sustenance of Jihad has been the will of Allah and the example of his apostle as recorded in Qur’an, Hadith, and Sira — Islam’s “sacred” texts — which state in part:

    “. . . the Messenger of Allah . . . would say: ‘Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war . . . When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action . . . Invite them to (accept) Islam . . . If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya . . . If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them…'” (Muslim Book 019, Number 4294).

    “. . . fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war) . . . ” (Qur’an 9:5).

    “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued” (Qur’an 9:29).

    “. . . fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah altogether and everywhere . . .” (Qur’an 8:38, 39).

    “Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you . . . ” (Qur’an 2:216).

    “Allah’s Apostle said: ‘I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle . . . ‘” (Bukhari Volume 1, Book 2, Number 24).

    “Muhammad said, ‘A single endeavor of fighting in Allah’s Cause is better than the world and whatever is in it’” (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 50).

    “Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home) . . . But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward…” (Qur’an 4:95).

    “A man came to Allah’s Apostle and said, ‘Instruct me as to such a deed as equals Jihad in reward.’ He replied, ‘I do not find such a deed’” (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 44).

    “Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain . . . ” (Qur’an 9:11).

    “Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): ‘I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them'” (Qur’an 8:12).

    “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been made victorious with terror.’” (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220).

Leave a comment