Winners at the Watcher’s Council *UPDATED*

Time flew, and I forgot to post the winner’s in the last vote over at the Watcher of Weasels. Let me start, for once, on the non-Council side, where the winning piece got the highest vote I’ve ever seen in my time on the Watcher’s council — and deservedly so. Andy Olmsted’s last post, which was placed on his own blog and at Obsidian Wings, was the hands-down, overwhelming winner. If you haven’t already read it, you have to. It’s funny, sad, inspiring, honest and deeply, deeply tragic, since the man who wrote it is gone forever. Second place, and it’s inevitably a distant second because of the pile-up of votes for Olmsted’s post, was Dr. Sanity’s Orchestrated Circuses and Clowns, which talks about the fact that the media circus in New Hampshire and Iowa obscures the fact that Americans are being called upon to chose a leader, with a leader’s temperament.

And now, back to the Council itself. Here, too, there was something of a blowout, with Wolf Howling garnering 5 points for a post on Britain’s Prosecution of the Blogger Lionheart for Criticism of Islam. Aside from being a good post, it’s also revealed that free speech often sees those of us who believe in moderate rationalism sharing the same platform as some pretty yucky people — including Lionheart. It turns out that Lionheart is a fairly hardcore member of Britain’s BNP, which is its ultra Right Wing party, somewhat akin to the KKK. Lionheart therefore speaks disparagingly, not only of Islam, but of everything that isn’t true blue white. Unsurprisingly, therefore, Lionheart ended up in a kerfuffle with Little Green Footballs, which completely denounces the British crackdown on free speech, but also takes issue with the White Supremacist material Lionheart espouses. All very confusing, but the critical point, and the one Wolf Howling appropriately emphasizes, is the totalitarian aspect of the British government’s attack on free speech.

The second place Council post was Soccer Dad’s marvelous Get a Clue, which guides the reader, step-by-step, through AP, AFP and Reuters coverage of the Palestinian people, just so you can see the level of dishonesty permeating this repeating, as well as the emotionalism that is meant to take the place of truth. (And for more on that, see the post immediately preceding this one.)

UPDATE:  I think Wolf Howling’s update, left in my comments section, is so informative, I’m moving a copy of it up here, into the post:

The relationship between Lionheart and the BNP is, I think, a bit more nuanced than you have stated.  In truth, I did not know Lionheart had any relationship with the BNP.  LGF readers subsuquently found a post by Lionheart wherein he discussed why he was going to vote for the BNP.  That vote was wholly predicated on the BNP’s opposition to radical Islam in the UK.  To be fair to Lionheart, he has not, to my knowledge, ever embraced the BNP’s racism.  Indeed, to the contrary, he maintains relationships with people of all nationalities and, indeed, his support of Israel has been noteworthy.  That comes out in the comments to the LGF post that you noted.

Unfortunately, the BNP is the only major political party in Britain to take a stand against radical Islam.  The Telegraph had an editorial the other day decrying how all three major political parties are courting the Muslim vote and refusing to address any of the ills brought on by multiculturalism and the growth of radicalism in the mosques.  While, from the safety of my chair in the U.S., I would never support them, I can understand Lionheart doing so from ground zero for radicalism in the UK.

At any rate, since I wrote the post about Lionheart, he went off the deep end.   I do support his right of free speech, but he is obviously lacking judgment.

3 Responses

  1. The first, from the Telegaph, discusses the existance of Muslim ‘no-go’ areas in the UK where the indigenous population dare not tread.

    Remember all the Leftists, and yes even Brits, that kept disparaging the US over dangerous areas in Iraq? They didn’t want to try to solve such problems and were having schadenfreude episodes about our difficulties. Now look where we are at. We now have the tools to deal with insurgencies and so called “no go zones” in foreign countries, a very good lesson for FBI and domestic police agencies willing to adopt similar approaches if our problems come anywhere close to Britain’s.

    War has yet again determined who are the sorry losers and who are the competent victors. And for Europe, they have rarely, if ever, been competent at warfare. Europe’s attempt at warfare was a disaster just as their attempt at peace was a disaster. Not a lot of luck for them, probably because you make your own luck.

    If you don’t try, like with Iraq, then you’ll get what Britain is getting.
    And it also shows that America can have as many listed allies as she wants, but they are primarily for diplomatic reasons rather than military. The kind of assets such as Georgia provided for COIN, is usually never mentionedp recisely because they are valuable assets in war, not diplomacy.

    nd, in a stinging indictment, expressed his judgment that the U.K. socialist’s policy of “multiculturalism has backfired spectacularly.”

    Muliculturalism did exactly what it was designed. Destroy the healthy and weak alike.

    Not surprisingly, PM Gordon Brown denied that any major problem exists.

    Stay the course when we are the captain, so sayeth the Left.

    You will be arrested on SUSPICION of the offence. You would only be charged following a full investigation based on all the relevant facts and CPS consent.

    Don’t you just love how the Left here in America wants to emulate Europe in all their glory. Including that little facet uncovered in the Aruba incident about how Europe can arrest their “subjects” and don’t have to charge them until the “authorities” feel good and ready. Just like how the British PM can call for elections when he feels good and ready.

    That marriage combines the socialist’s core ethos of multiculturalism with the creation of a reliable, and increasingly critical, Muslim electoral bloc.

    The alliance between the Left and fascists, it always keeps occuring. No matter how much Hitler may have hated Stalin.

    Britain’s situation again proves what happens when people think they can choose not to go to war. There were many British loyalists in America that wanted to remain part of the British Empire. Other Americans disagreed. Those that won the American Revolution was proven right. It would not be a good thing for Britain’s laws to still be affecting America. If only because the British have proven themselves incapable fo governing themselves.

  2. The relationship between Lionheart and the BNP is, I think, a bit more nuanced than you have stated. In truth, I did not know Lionheart had any relationship with the BNP. LGF readers subsuquently found a post by Lionheart wherein he discussed why he was going to vote for the BNP. That vote was wholly predicated on the BNP’s opposition to radical Islam in the UK. To be fair to Lionheart, he has not, to my knowledge, ever embraced the BNP’s racism. Indeed, to the contrary, he maintains relationships with people of all nationalities and, indeed, his support of Israel has been noteworthy. That comes out in the comments to the LGF post that you noted.

    Unfortunately, the BNP is the only major political party in Britain to take a stand against radical Islam. The Telegraph had an editorial the other day decrying how all three major political parties are courting the Muslim vote and refusing to address any of the ills brought on by multiculturalism and the growth of radicalism in the mosques. While, from the safety of my chair in the U.S., I would never support them, I can understand Lionheart doing so from ground zero for radicalism in the UK.

    At any rate, since I wrote the post about Lionheart, he went off the deep end. I do support his right of free speech, but he is obviously lacking judgment.

    http://wolfhowling.blogspot.com/2008/01/what-ridiculousness.html

  3. When you give a people no option but to vote for Hitler, whose fault is it that people choose survival over you?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: