Even fairweather friends can be useful

Kerry assured us that, because he spoke French and loved the UN, he would have Europeans eating out of America’s hand if he were to become President. How great must his chagrin be with the fact that it is during Bush’s watch that the Europeans are coming back to us. And it is during Bush’s watch — and despite the War in Iraq — that the more stable Arab nations are coming back to us. They may not like Bush or America, but with Russia and China placing pressure on Europe, and Iran placing pressure on fellow Muslims, political expediency is driving them back into the American penumbra. Charles Krauthammer, not unsurprisingly, sums it up well:

And it makes the point that the Bush critics have missed for years — that the strength of alliances is heavily dependent on the objective balance of international forces, and has very little to do with the syntax of the U.S. president or the disdain in which he might be held by a country’s cultural elites.

It’s classic balance-of-power theory: Weaker nations turn to the great outside power to help them balance a rising regional threat. Allies are not sentimental about their associations. It is not a matter of affection, but of need — and of the great power’s ability to deliver.

What’s changed in the last year? Bush’s dress and diction remain the same. But he did change generals — and counterinsurgency strategy — in Iraq. As a result, Iraq has gone from an apparently lost cause to a winnable one.

The rise of external threats to our allies has concentrated their minds on the need for the American connection. The revival of American fortunes in Iraq — and the diminished prospect of an American rout — have significantly increased the value of such a connection. This is particularly true among our moderate Arab allies who see us as their ultimate protection against an Iran-Syria-Hezbollah-Hamas axis that openly threatens them all.

Once again, it seems that actual reality is running counter to the conclusions that the “reality based party” has drawn in approach the world around it.

4 Responses

  1. People misunderstand folks when they claim that they are the “reality based party”. It doesn’t mean that they are based upon reality, what it means is that they are able to craft, manipulate, and bend reality to their whims. This is true, doubt me not. For is it not true that abiding by reality is far harder than shaping it to your whims?

    As a point of reference then, how easy would it be to craft a fantasy world in an insane mind compared to Alexander the Maniac conquering the entire known world? There is a fundamental difficulty slope here.

    “Reality based community” simply means that reality is what they base their priority upon. Shaping reality, then, becomes all important machination in illusion and deception.

  2. […] [Discuss this article with Bookworm over at Bookworm Room…] Share Article UN, Iraq, Russia, and China, Iran    Sphere: Related Content Trackback URL […]

  3. Whenever I hear the Democrat/Left refer to themselves as the “reality based”, I think back to Timothy Leary’s “tune in, drop out…” and reflect upon the damage that he did to so many peoples’ minds.

  4. Charles Krauthammer’s generally the brightest guy in the room – whatever room he happens to be in.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: