A positive outcome for the law of unintended consequences

Before 9/11, when the Taliban were still a concern to people of all good will, I remember seeing news reports and hearing stories about the horrors of life for women under the Taliban. They were, quite literally, trapped in their homes, unable to go out even fully covered. A logical by-product was a high child mortality rate, both because mothers could not get them to medical care (not to mention the fact that the medical population had dropped when women were barred from practicing) and because mothers, imprisoned in small quarters with too many small children committed acts of child brutality that often resulted in the child’s death.

So it was without surprise that I read a Reuter’s report saying that, since the US invasion, child mortality in Afghanistan has dropped by 25 percent:

Child mortality has dropped by 25 percent in Afghanistan since the Taliban government was overthrown in 2001, meaning that 89,000 more children survive each year, the Afghan Health Ministry said on Sunday.

After nearly three decades of war, Afghanistan’s health indicators are among the worst in the world, but Afghan government and international efforts are beginning to bear fruit, with healthcare reaching 85 percent of the population.

The number of children dying before the age of five had dropped from an estimated 257 per 1,000 in 2001, to 191 in 2006, according to a survey conducted by Johns Hopkins University, quoted by the ministry.

“One of the Afghanistan’s biggest miseries has been the death of children at a young age due to the lack of health facilities and equipment,” President Hamid Karzai said on Sunday.

“I am thankful to all the health service organisations and the international community from the bottom of my heart,” he said. “This is the biggest happiness in Afghanistan — that we are now able to keep 89,000 children alive.”

4 Responses

  1. […] [Discuss This Topic with Bookworm at Bookworm Room] Share Article Taliban, mothers, medical care, children, Afghanistan    Sphere: Related Content Trackback URL Please vote for Webloggin at the Weblog Awards by clicking on this link here, searching for the word “Webloggin” and clicking on the + sign. No registration required. […]

  2. Does anyone think that George Bush will be blamed for reducing the infant mortality rate in Afghanistan because he had the evil desire to invade and throw out the Taliban?
    Al

  3. Thanks for posting🙂

  4. When you read an article like this it is hard to debate whether the U.S. and the world should, or should not have, invaded Afghanistan. I can’t imagine trying to explain to 89,000 children per year that, “yes it is nice you are alive thanks to the Taliban being overthrown but we shouldn’t have gotten involved.” Above all is we should recognize the sanctity of life and 89,000 more children per year alive and well is statement enough. If you discount this then you are as evil as the Taliban. Apparently their children’s health and well being did not appear to be of much concern to them either.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: