Comments on: Learning about Ron Paul

By: Ron Paul’s money problem « Bookworm Room

Ron Paul’s money problem « Bookworm Room — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:00:02 +0000

[...] to offer about himself — the carefully considered distillation of his big ideas — and blogged about my reaction to those ideas. Based purely on his lean, mean, campaign-friendly assertions, I concluded that some of his ideas [...]

By: Bookworm

Bookworm — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 03:36:27 +0000

Long time readers of this blog know that I know Naomi from way back, which means that I know that she’s truly brilliant, and I know that she’s a drama queen poseur, from a soft Communist 1960s/1970s Bay Area background. It’s the latter that makes suspect anything she writes so brilliantly about.

By: Gray

Gray — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 01:59:50 +0000

I suggest having a listen to: Naomi Wolf, Fascist America in 10 Easy Steps.

But she’s never been right about anything before–not even Al Gore wearing earth tones….

By: Paul Weber

Paul Weber — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:15:39 +0000

If you are happy with the way things are going, vote for any of the other candidates. They attract the devious special interest groups that are ripping off the general public.

I think it’s sad when people don’t recognise a true statesman who has integrity. Is the constitution currently in shreds? Yes.

Ron Paul is the only candidate that makes sense.

I suggest having a listen to: Naomi Wolf, Fascist America in 10 Easy Steps.

the Red Flashing Warning lights should be going off in everyones heads!

Ron Paul supporters have had to resort to alternative methods to get the word out because main stream media is controlled by globalist bankers and multinational corporations.

The NAU is not fiction, the C.F.R. has strong influence over most of the other candidates (Rep and Dem)

By: benning

benning — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:43:33 +0000

Ron Paul is a Libertarian running as a Republican. He may have similar stands with many Republicans, but at the end he’s too “out there” as are many in the Libertarian Party. He’s not a small “L” libertarian.

By: Gray

Gray — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:47:20 +0000

Wow, Bookworm! That was some high-quality ‘fisking’ of Ru-paul.

I saw a car in a parking lot yesterday with a ‘No War’ sticker and a Ron Paul for President sticker….

Ru-Paul is another Nader.

By: Mike Devx

Mike Devx — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:41:44 +0000

Let me put it this way (as if I haven’t been clear enough!).

Take the most briliant author, of the mot poetic, soaring words. If he or she descends into a long hacking, coughing FIT every third word, you wouldn’t let that author be the voice on tape.

You’d market your tape with someone better able to deliver the message.

Human nature.

By: Mike Devx

Mike Devx — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:26:33 +0000

He is an Impossible Politician. I can agree that as a marketplace philosopher, he might attract a crowd.

I have seen him in several debates. As a politician, he is a Complete Loser. He has two voices: Hector and Lecture. He is unimportant as a politician.

Let him gather his advocates for some future politician to reap. He is utterly hopeless beyond the true believers.

By: Bald-Headed Geek

Bald-Headed Geek — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 02:16:44 +0000

I don’t think that Congressman Paul can be divorced from the sheer lunacy of many of his supporters, especially the rabid anti-Semites.

BHG

By: Ellie

Ellie — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 22:08:56 +0000

It is likely the Libertarians will nominate Ron Paul again. Wonder if he would pull some voters who are to the Left of Hillary — especially on the War? The Moveon crowd ….