I dare you to visit the mural with your cans… I want to see how the guys on the street react to your action. In fact I dare any of you. If you think you understand the street dynamics that exist on those streets you have a quick lesson to learn. Good luck. The reason those images are even there is because in your great American society we all have freedom of speech, don’t justify terrorism and censorship just because its government sponsored i dont see any one of you talking about how that border/wall which the Palestinians are breaking down is in fact on what is internationally recognized as PALESTINIAN land, is that missing from your understanding & knowledge or is that your status and history prevents you from understand the struggle of another oppressed people now that you are that oppressor?

I mean if the Draka were in power, these spies and saboteurs inside America would have a very short shelf life.

Regardless of whatever world orders is or is not in existence, what stays the same is human motivation. There is always going to be people that will rebel against the system or try to undermine. Partially because they can and partially because they are greedy and want more than they could get under the system. If the UN bureacrats were offered limitless virgin boys and girls and billions in retirement each year individually, they would be great American lovers. So long as America paid their check and didn’t interfere in their little games and fun, of course. But that is thing. The Good won’t allow the Evil, and that pisses the Evil off, doesn’t it.

Functionally, matter and anti-matter destroy each other because they simply cannot exist in the same place at the same time. This is a unviersal concept, not just a human one.

The comment I wrote to the Jena story is also relevant to Book’s topic on Palestinian-Mexican immigrant connections.

It is not that you shouldn’t keep trying, but rather you should keep things in perspective. Be realistic about your expectations and degree of progress. Past a certain point there will be a degree of diminishing returns and you will have to decide whether the slightly additional understanding you gain of a diseased and decrepit belief system balances out the amount of effort you have expended. There’s only so much you can learn about nihilism before you would have to become a nihilist to learn more. The Art of War does not recommend that you become your enemy only that you understand him to defeat him.

The reason why people, arch feminists that lobbied for more action in Afghanistan to help their “sisters” there under the heel of oppression, turned against Operation Enduring Freedom is because they never believed in libert or equality of under the law for women. What they believed in was whatever benefited them personally in an emotional or intellectual or economic fashion. At the time, agitating for Afghanistan women served their purposes. When it came time to build a better world however, narcissists, nihilists, Leftists, useful idiots, etc cannot go against their beliefs in entropy to actually dirty their hands with building a better world. After all, servants of entropy are in the business of weakening people, not building them up.

Oh, be assured, the students and the professoriate, the latter being the far more important factor in organization power, believe that they are building a better world. Hence why “useful idiot” is a useful title for such. For example, some folks believe that Amanie is a good guy, a freedom fighter that simply resists the juggernaut of American power for the good of his people laboring under Imperial threats that America has already instituted in Iraq. Why wouldn’t they support this underdog (that executes pet dogs) against the murderous entity and global threat called America?

One question you have to ask yourself, Mike, is whether Leftist beliefs and false slogans were ever concerned about the plight of the downtrodden and the helpless. Remember, they were created with the aid of Soviet organizations, funding, and ideology backed up by centuries of Socialist conditioning and aristocratic inheritance. Would the Soviets create an organization that would interfere with the Soviets’ ability to squeeze as many coins they could from the proles and the middle class to go into the Communist party party fund? No, of course not.

It was simply a front. Leftist organizations were created as a front for entropy and totalitarianism and thus they remain a front for entropy and totalitarianism. With the Soviets gone, they have gone looking for new masters to tell them what to do. The Left were never designed to be self-aware tools, Mike.

The thing is, because the Left is so parochial, rather than the cosmopolitan title they falsely claim to hold, the Left tends to fall prey to much ignorance about foreign matters. It isn’t so much that they can’t access or don’t know about how things are in Iran, rather it is more like they only care about what is going on in their own little village. Whatever happens across that mountain or river… simply does not exist for them either in the reality or in the abstract. Why? Because they cannot simply imagine a people or a situation DIFFERENT from what they have known. Parochialism, Mike. All they do know is American problems and American centered policies. That is what they are designed to fight, Mike, thus it makes logical sense to restrict a tool’s ability to be aware only of that which it was designed to solve, correct?

From 2005:
A Columbia University body that helps set policy voted yesterday to reject a resolution calling for reinstatement of the R.O.T.C., which has been banned from the campus since 1969. … The vote, which followed a two-hour debate that centered on discrimination by the military against people who are openly gay, was 51 to 11. Several participants called it surprisingly lopsided.

From 2007:
Students at Columbia University showed guarded enthusiasm Friday toward a planned visit next week by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

I am confused.

So, the students and the administration at Columbia U have banned the ROTC because of discrimination against gays by the military. They’ve done so since 1999, due to Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.

But Achmanijihad is a supporter of radical jihad whose government regularly MURDERS gays by hanging and other more grisly forms of execution. And this fellow is invited by the administration at Columbia and the students are said to be guardedly enthusiastic. Many of them, I am sure, consider his appearance to be beyond wonderful.

What gives? The problem with the ROTC, based on the above comparison, do not appear to be about gays at all. It CANNOT be about gays, since the entire University should be in a total frantic meltdown about gay-KILLER Achmed-baby.

Can anyone explain them?