Unusually for me, I spent a lot of time in the car today and, even more unusually, I didn’t have any kids in the back. That meant that I got to listen to some pretty long stretches of talk radio. I heard two interesting things, one from Dennis Prager, and one from Michael Medved.
The Dennis Prager bit was his segment (or, at least, most of his segment) interviewing Chris Hedges, author of American Fascists : The Christian Right and the War on America. Unsurprisingly, given the book’s title, Hedges was for many years a correspondent for the New York Times. Prager did a fabulous interview. Without ever becoming hostile, or overbearing or aggressive, he repeatedly exposed the hollow fatuity and fear underlying Hedges’ basic premise, which is that a broad segment of American Christian fundamentalists are precisely the same in tone and quality as Al Qaeda or Wahabbi-ists. It was a masterful interview, and one I strongly recommend. If this link doesn’t work, just go here and look for Prager’s “Christo-Fascism” show from May 18.
The second thing I heard, which hasn’t been uploaded yet onto Townhall radio, was Michael Medved’s riff about the compromise immigration bill working through Congress. I’d already figured out that the bill has the Republicans in a bind. The Democrats are all for it, because they’re counting on millions of new Democrats flowing in from South of the Border (with 12 million having already arrived illegally). The Republicans, who object both to the morality of granting amnesty to cheaters and to the idea of 12 million new, probably Democratic voters, nevertheless cannot object too much because, if they appear hostile to Hispanics (rather than hostile to a Democratic bid for permanent political power), they risk alienating (a) current Hispanic conservatives and (b) any future Hispanic conservatives. In other words, they’re damned if they do and damned if they don’t. Medved points out, however, that the compromise bill provides that those given amnesty can vote, at the earliest, only 13 years after the Bill goes into effect.
A lot can happen in 13 years. So, while the Republicans are bowing to the inevitable, they’re also getting a very valuable commodity: time. Who knows? In 13 years, quality Republican leadership (assuming such can be had), might be able to convince Hispanics that it is not in their best interest to vote for a party that has for forty years backed policies, such as unlimited welfare and bilingualism, that seem aimed to keep many immigrants ghettoized forever.
Filed under: Uncategorized







“In 13 years, quality Republican leadership (assuming such can be had), might be able to convince Hispanics that it is not in their best interest to vote for a party that has for forty years backed policies, such as unlimited welfare and bilingualism, that seem aimed to keep many immigrants ghettoized forever.”
Exactly right. This is why President Bush’s unprecedented outreach to Blacks caught in the same ghetto paid such dividends in his 2004 re-election, dramatically altering the racial breakdown of the electorate by breaking the Democrat stranglehold on the Black vote. That’s why PA Governor Lynn Swann and MD Senator Michael Steele have been leading the charge to get this amnesty bill passed.
You are now leaving the twilight zone.
I’ve been a registered voter in four different states, and I have yet to be asked for proof of citizenship when establishing residency. The Z-Visa gives illegals access to every thing they need to establish residency and register to vote. Most of them won’t wait until 2020 to start voting. They’ll vote next year. The Dems –excuse me– ACORN — will see to that.
This Bill is about destroying the Republican Party. No more no less.
In other words, they’re damned if they do and damned if they don’t.
Why don’t you start damning your enemies then instead of always playing catch up and release?
It seems to me that if you are caught between a rock and a hard place, the thing to do is either drill down, fly up, or annihilate one of the obstacles.
Those are the words.
I’m probably going to be sorry that I asked, but here goes:
Are you asking me specifically? Or are you asking conservatives generally? Or Republicans more generally still?
If it’s me specifically, I’ll do my best. Drat! Outmanuevered by those rotten scoundrels. How dare they take advantage of Bush’s compassionate “conservatism?” How dare they co-opt out of touch Republican Beltway insiders itching to cut a deal for the sake of deal cutting? How dare they use their Senate majority to push a bill that benefits their key constituencies and splits ours? You’d think the only thing they care about is their own power.
Less sarcastically, I agree with you on playing catch up all the time. The problem there is that too often when the Democrats start advancing, the Republican left flank starts collapsing instead of holding the line. So if we’re not going to collapse entirely, it’s time to start shooting deserters and bayonetting stragglers. Figuratively of course.
Finally, thanks for the advice. How Jack Handey of you.
[...] [Discuss this article with Bookworm over at the Bookworm Room…] Share Article Dennis Prager, Michael Medved, New York Times, Al Qaeda, Republicans, Democrats, Hispanic Sphere: Related Content Trackback URL [...]
Color me wildly optimistic, but I don’t think that the immigrant hispanic vote will stay democrat for very long.
I think they want to work. And make money. And raise families. I think that (immigration laws not withstanding) they want nice law abiding neighborhoods. I think that they will be appalled and alienated by a political movement that encourages, and in fact depends on increasing the size of the welfare state.
Basically: like any good conservative I think that people are good, hard working and well meaning.
Regards,
Joe
Are you asking me specifically? Or are you asking conservatives generally? Or Republicans more generally still?
I speak of it as a scenario in which we should consider tactically. So yes to all of the above. In the scenario you posited, that was my reaction to it, and it doesn’t matter whether conservatives or Republicans or we were in it. People are in it, for sure, and those are what matters.
ya, there’s a big morale problem there. And the Duke Rape case vs systematic torture is just one of the causes.
Finally, thanks for the advice. How Jack Handey of you.
We are talking about the twilight zone now.