ps Oh by the way, read the book ,and see IF YOU CAN LEARN an EARN YOUR TITLE ! Pass the Swampgas !!

Anyhow, it’s a superficially appealing “analysis”, but whoever said that most abortions are not among the young inner-city females is correct – they’re a relatively small proportion of all that take place. And that anyone would justify killing the unborn on this basis is truly chilling.
Danny has it straight – the left in both Europe and our country is gung-ho for eugenics, only they won’t call it that.

Again, if you hunt around the Web, you’ll find the refutations – and they’re based on numbers, not just hot air.

It’s pretty rare for family court judge to have to rule in constitutional matters.

This offsets the Left’s tendency to sort of say let’s be the EU and whatever. This totally undercuts it, simply because Europe is our time machine. We know what’s going to happen in America 10 to 30 years down the road if the Left was in charge. The Left’s role model is experiencing it now, and what do people think will occur if the Left is successfully in making the US emulate Europe?

Gun control, euthanasia, abortion, everything and anything, Europe provides us the wisdom to see through. Their sacrificial burning is a chance for others to remain free, even if they should fall.

It is useful for far more than illuminating such a stainless and sterile connection. Because it ignores who promotes abortion as a social engineering solution. The Left doesn’t primarily rely upon euthanasia and their pet projects to solve crime but rather to increase the disenfranchisement of various minority groups. Because we all know to a certain extent that when minority groups assimilate and adapt to the mainstream culture, we have less possibility of dissent, riots, and revolutionary disaffection. This reduces the ability of a party such as the Democrats, to control that specific demographic. As with immigration, the goal is power, but power achieved by producing disharmony in the social fabric, causing a need that can be exploited.

So long as immigrants are unlawful, separated from society, and unable to assimilate because of Democrat tactics and promoted to stay apart because of Democrat bilingual language programs, the ghettoization of minorities begin. And they keep on going.

Once started, it is a self-renewing cycle. You don’t need a central conspiratorial organizer, it organizes itself. The newest generation will look to pop culture, and self-destructive methods instead of education and self-improvement. Rap and gansta style elevation of crime and prison. People like Jesse Jackson knew they suffered a defeat when the first black white President put an end to certain highs of welfare. They suffered terribly when the conditions for blacks improved in the job sector because of that.

The less disharmony there is, the less people may profit off it.

People say a lot of things they don’t support. Support the troops, support the draft, call for war crimes, impeachment before elections, bipartisanship after Nancy wins.

In order to deal with the problems of society, like crime in Iraq, first you have to eliminate those who are sustaining the problem and encouraging it (Iranian agents). With the new indoctrination camps designed to convert an entire generation of middle and high income familes’ children, we have a trend that will eventually result the disruption of the social fabric as we know it. Weakening the inside defenses is simply a prelude, it is the illegal immigration of mobsters, drug lords, and gang members (terrorists as well) that will eventually increase crime and distability.

Europe increased taxes and produced abortion and euthanasia. Then after that, they invited in a second class of citizens and indebted servants, to do their dirty work. By giving them the right to vote, the politicians of Europe also gain a neat little group of people they could count on to provide them with endless power and term limits. Up until they revolt, of course, and kill the aristocracy. Slave revolts are always nasty affairs.

People say that the Left in the US are following the European socialism model. Have they considered the implications of that? Not just the obvious implications, but the more far reaching ones, that we see even now occuring in Europe.

Furthermore poverty and despair and broken homes also produce elevated crime rates.

That’s why I do believe the statistics indicate that when abortion became readily available to poor young women in the mid-70’s, the result is that crime dropped in the late 80’s and early 90’s.

But I’m shocked that people would argue that this makes abortion a preferable alternative. That is a particularly pernicious use of the form of argument that states that the ends justify the means. It is also only one narrow viewpoint on the effects that abortion has on a society. There are of course many other effects and you should consider all of them.

This viewpoint on abortion reveals the effects of young adult males on crime rates, in particular poor, poverty-ridden, values-deficient young adult males.
It’s useful solely for illuminating that connection. How we choose the best way to deal with that problem speaks to our worth as a society. Relying on abortion to alleviate that problem doesn’t speak well for us, I think.