The Democrats have turned their sights on John Bolton, the only sane voice in the UN. If you want to attempt to stem this tide, here’s a website with ideas for helping out. If you want some background about (a) how utterly degraded, debased and anti-Semitic the UN is and (b) how important Bolton is as a lone voice against this ugliness, check out Eye on the UN.
It galls me that America supports the UN. If we have to engage in this ugly task with my tax dollars, let’s at least have a strong, ethical spokesman.
Hat tip: Michelle Malkin
Filed under: United Nations
Supporting the UN has tarnished America’s reputation, honor, and pride. Not just to Americans, but to every other pro-American in this world as well. You judge a person by his enemies and his friends. So how would an impartial viewer, judge America’s silent approval of UN atrocities, without even the excuse that these atrocities were perpetrated against people America did not care about? The UN Oil for Food and various other operations were designed specifically to hurt America and Americans, and yet America does not strike back as any rational human would. How would an impartial viewer see this silent approval? Could they tell who America’s enemies are based upon just how we behave on a policy level? No, they could not. We treat our enemies as friends, both inside and outside. And we treat our friends, as enemies, both the Kurds and anyone else who likes America, who believed in America, only to be left to die by America.
America is the king of the world, if not de jure, then certainly de facto. But regardless of how beloved the king is, if he is crazy and acts crazy, then he is going to get overthrown. I think treating your friends as enemies and your enemies as friends, constitutes being “crazy”.