<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The risk of having principles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bookwormroom.wordpress.com/2006/10/06/the-risk-of-having-principles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bookwormroom.wordpress.com/2006/10/06/the-risk-of-having-principles/</link>
	<description>She escaped from the belly of the liberal beast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://bookwormroom.wordpress.com/2006/10/06/the-risk-of-having-principles/#comment-12954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookwormroom.wordpress.com/2006/10/06/the-risk-of-having-principles/#comment-12954</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;You know, it’s funny - but it isn’t funny. These people, as I think about it, are not amusing. They are dangerous, hateful, hate-filled, obviously willing to tolerate and engage in amy amount of sleaze for the furtherance of their own ends - and should be adamantly kept from the public square.&lt;/b&gt;

Historically, rulers who had uppity nobels either executed them, used the army to seize their property (good idea), or sent them into exhile in the arse end of nowhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>You know, it’s funny &#8211; but it isn’t funny. These people, as I think about it, are not amusing. They are dangerous, hateful, hate-filled, obviously willing to tolerate and engage in amy amount of sleaze for the furtherance of their own ends &#8211; and should be adamantly kept from the public square.</b></p>
<p>Historically, rulers who had uppity nobels either executed them, used the army to seize their property (good idea), or sent them into exhile in the arse end of nowhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webloggin - Blog Archive &#187; The risk of having principles</title>
		<link>http://bookwormroom.wordpress.com/2006/10/06/the-risk-of-having-principles/#comment-12917</link>
		<dc:creator>Webloggin - Blog Archive &#187; The risk of having principles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 18:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookwormroom.wordpress.com/2006/10/06/the-risk-of-having-principles/#comment-12917</guid>
		<description>[...] [Discuss this post with BookWorm] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Discuss this post with BookWorm] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trimegistus</title>
		<link>http://bookwormroom.wordpress.com/2006/10/06/the-risk-of-having-principles/#comment-12916</link>
		<dc:creator>Trimegistus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 17:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookwormroom.wordpress.com/2006/10/06/the-risk-of-having-principles/#comment-12916</guid>
		<description>The Democrat plan for dealing with the menace of Islamic terrorism:

&quot;Look!  That Republican&#039;s a FAG!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democrat plan for dealing with the menace of Islamic terrorism:</p>
<p>&#8220;Look!  That Republican&#8217;s a FAG!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://bookwormroom.wordpress.com/2006/10/06/the-risk-of-having-principles/#comment-12914</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 17:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookwormroom.wordpress.com/2006/10/06/the-risk-of-having-principles/#comment-12914</guid>
		<description>Well, I did greatly enjoy the tail-end of the nineties!  It was just so much fun to watch the feminists twist themselves into pretzels - and incidentally make nonsense out of their own most sacred utterances - trying to make it okay for Clinton to do what he did, while at the same time trying to explain why it wasn&#039;t at all okay for Clarence Thomas, Bob Packwood, et al.

You rarely get it so right out in the open like that, with no smallest pretense that it&#039;s something other than politically-motivated BS.

You know, it&#039;s funny - but it isn&#039;t funny.  These people, as I think about it, are not amusing.  They are dangerous, hateful, hate-filled, obviously willing to tolerate and engage in amy amount of sleaze for the furtherance of their own ends - and should be adamantly kept from the public square.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I did greatly enjoy the tail-end of the nineties!  It was just so much fun to watch the feminists twist themselves into pretzels &#8211; and incidentally make nonsense out of their own most sacred utterances &#8211; trying to make it okay for Clinton to do what he did, while at the same time trying to explain why it wasn&#8217;t at all okay for Clarence Thomas, Bob Packwood, et al.</p>
<p>You rarely get it so right out in the open like that, with no smallest pretense that it&#8217;s something other than politically-motivated BS.</p>
<p>You know, it&#8217;s funny &#8211; but it isn&#8217;t funny.  These people, as I think about it, are not amusing.  They are dangerous, hateful, hate-filled, obviously willing to tolerate and engage in amy amount of sleaze for the furtherance of their own ends &#8211; and should be adamantly kept from the public square.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erp</title>
		<link>http://bookwormroom.wordpress.com/2006/10/06/the-risk-of-having-principles/#comment-12910</link>
		<dc:creator>erp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 17:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookwormroom.wordpress.com/2006/10/06/the-risk-of-having-principles/#comment-12910</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If you’re a Republican it’s unforgiveable. If you’re a Democrat pretty much anything is forgiveable.&lt;/i&gt;

By jove, I think he&#039;s got it!  h/t Rex Harrison</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If you’re a Republican it’s unforgiveable. If you’re a Democrat pretty much anything is forgiveable.</i></p>
<p>By jove, I think he&#8217;s got it!  h/t Rex Harrison</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://bookwormroom.wordpress.com/2006/10/06/the-risk-of-having-principles/#comment-12869</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 01:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookwormroom.wordpress.com/2006/10/06/the-risk-of-having-principles/#comment-12869</guid>
		<description>What it all proves of course is that despite the screeching there is no actual standard, it&#039;s all political.

If you&#039;re a Republican it&#039;s unforgiveable.  If you&#039;re a Democrat pretty much anything is forgiveable.

The end result of course is that serious don&#039;t take anything the feminists&#039; say seriously.  You can&#039;t seem to explain this to the ladies, either; that all they accomplish is to trivialize and render laughable their own cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What it all proves of course is that despite the screeching there is no actual standard, it&#8217;s all political.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a Republican it&#8217;s unforgiveable.  If you&#8217;re a Democrat pretty much anything is forgiveable.</p>
<p>The end result of course is that serious don&#8217;t take anything the feminists&#8217; say seriously.  You can&#8217;t seem to explain this to the ladies, either; that all they accomplish is to trivialize and render laughable their own cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://bookwormroom.wordpress.com/2006/10/06/the-risk-of-having-principles/#comment-12858</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 22:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookwormroom.wordpress.com/2006/10/06/the-risk-of-having-principles/#comment-12858</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;As Goldberg argues, Democratic standards tend to be more situational or, I should say, are tied to the actor:&lt;/b&gt;

How about &quot;morally flexible&quot;? Ala Nero?

&lt;B&gt;The puritanical zeal of these inquisitions cannot be exaggerated.&lt;/b&gt;

There goes that Leftist atheist alliance with wacko religionite Right-wing Christians again.

Don&#039;t you just love how slimy, sick, and tempting Evil is, Bookworm? It permeats everything and everyone, and the ones who have it the most, are the most ignorant of their current state.

People might be wondering why I&#039;m touching upon that Dark Side, that Leftist alliance of greed, guilt, and insatiable thirst for power. Well, it helps to put oneself into one&#039;s enemy&#039;s shoes. What better way to do it than to act and to think as one of them.

People who are flexible are unable to be caught. However, once caught, they will shatter as ice. The Left&#039;s predominantly weak spot, is their inability to stand firm. When threatened with real violence, annihilation, and self-destruction, they will fold as the leaf before the hurricane. The reason why they even exist with this mortal wound of a weakness, is because the United States Marine Corp and the United States Army and Citizen Militia, protects the Left from the Left&#039;s own demons.

Once you retract this protection, they will not stand.

It&#039;s fun to be doing insinuations and accussations and sabotage operations, from a Left perspective. It&#039;s one upping your opponent, knowing that you have a plan that your opponent is unaware of, and preventing any guilt from surfacing by burying this knowledge of your plans deep deep into your psyche. If you haven&#039;t already, I suggest that you, Bookworm, read Neo&#039;s latest posts about someone who was with the Left as an operator for decades and has now switched over to the &quot;Dark Side&quot; so to speak.

But the Republicans are not the Dark Side. I know, I&#039;ve been on the Left, after all. Not as long as 10 years or many decades, but long enough. And if it isn&#039;t long enough, I can always go back temporarily, and put myself into the shoe of a Leftist saboteur and espionage operator. It&#039;s a lot more entertaining than reading the comments from the Left, after all, who wouldn&#039;t know a professional propaganda operation if the Jihadists cut their necks off with one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>As Goldberg argues, Democratic standards tend to be more situational or, I should say, are tied to the actor:</b></p>
<p>How about &#8220;morally flexible&#8221;? Ala Nero?</p>
<p><b>The puritanical zeal of these inquisitions cannot be exaggerated.</b></p>
<p>There goes that Leftist atheist alliance with wacko religionite Right-wing Christians again.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you just love how slimy, sick, and tempting Evil is, Bookworm? It permeats everything and everyone, and the ones who have it the most, are the most ignorant of their current state.</p>
<p>People might be wondering why I&#8217;m touching upon that Dark Side, that Leftist alliance of greed, guilt, and insatiable thirst for power. Well, it helps to put oneself into one&#8217;s enemy&#8217;s shoes. What better way to do it than to act and to think as one of them.</p>
<p>People who are flexible are unable to be caught. However, once caught, they will shatter as ice. The Left&#8217;s predominantly weak spot, is their inability to stand firm. When threatened with real violence, annihilation, and self-destruction, they will fold as the leaf before the hurricane. The reason why they even exist with this mortal wound of a weakness, is because the United States Marine Corp and the United States Army and Citizen Militia, protects the Left from the Left&#8217;s own demons.</p>
<p>Once you retract this protection, they will not stand.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s fun to be doing insinuations and accussations and sabotage operations, from a Left perspective. It&#8217;s one upping your opponent, knowing that you have a plan that your opponent is unaware of, and preventing any guilt from surfacing by burying this knowledge of your plans deep deep into your psyche. If you haven&#8217;t already, I suggest that you, Bookworm, read Neo&#8217;s latest posts about someone who was with the Left as an operator for decades and has now switched over to the &#8220;Dark Side&#8221; so to speak.</p>
<p>But the Republicans are not the Dark Side. I know, I&#8217;ve been on the Left, after all. Not as long as 10 years or many decades, but long enough. And if it isn&#8217;t long enough, I can always go back temporarily, and put myself into the shoe of a Leftist saboteur and espionage operator. It&#8217;s a lot more entertaining than reading the comments from the Left, after all, who wouldn&#8217;t know a professional propaganda operation if the Jihadists cut their necks off with one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
