Why Johnny can’t read

There was a whole lot going on at the annual National Education Association convention, but not a whole lot of it seemed to have anything to do with education.  Thus, because it’s clear that our nation’s children are learning reading and writing at rocket-like speed (this is said with a sarcastic intonation and a smirk), the NEA was able to turn its attention to the real scourge of public education — homophobia.  Thus, the NEA made clear it’s support for gay civil unions.  You can tell this from a muddily worded resolution on “Racism, Sexism, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identification Discrimination”:

“The Association also believes that these factors should not affect the legal rights and obligations of the partners in a legally recognized domestic partnership, civil union, or marriage in regard to matters involving the other partner, such as medical decisions, taxes, inheritance, adoption, and immigration.” “Factors” refers to “race, gender, sexual orientation, gender identification, disability, ethnicity, immigration status, occupation, and religion.”

In case that wasn’t clear enough, the NEA elaborated on the fact that, not only are our schools rapidly becoming education-free zones, they must definitely purge the rampant homophobia affecting them.  There’s another smirk from me here, because I actually haven’t heard about rampant homophobia affecting our nation’s schools.  But there must be, because why would the NEA, in addition to the above pronouncement, also have felt compelled to make this one:

Other NEA resolutions promote the gay rights agenda in public school curricula by demanding funds to alleviate “sexual orientation discrimination,” to use multicultural education to reduce “homophobia,” and even to put “diversity-based curricula” and “bias-free screening devices in early childhood education.” Another resolution demands that schools hire “a diverse teaching staff.”

There is another scourge that the NEA is determined to stamp out, and stamp out hard — competition.  According to the same Phyllis Schlafly article, the NEA passed a huge series of resolutions against vouchers, school choice and home schooling.  It also did everything within its power to make home schooling more difficult.  These attacks on home schooling remind me of a story Kurt Vonnegut wrote before he went crazy.  The story, called Harrison Bergeron, imagines a future in which everyone must be equal — and since the untalented cannot be given talent, equality is achieved by handicapping the talented.  Intelligent people have implants in their brains that disrupt thought, physically gifted people must wear huge weights and chains, and beautiful peopled are hidden behind grotesque masks.  When the story came out in 1968, I’m sure many thought Vonnegut was exaggerating.  I’m not so sure now.

The NEA also wants to take complete control of our children’s sexuality, teaching them everything they always wanted to know about sex (but were afraid to ask their parents), bringing Planned Parenthood onto campus, and generally removing from parents any right to guide their children’s morals.

Just to wrap up their excessive concern with everything but a public school’s main functioning — teaching basic educational principles — the NEA made sure to get involved in world politics by endorsing myriad organizations hostile to the United States:

The NEA is a big supporter of every sort of globalism and international commitment. NEA resolutions endorse global education, multicultural education, the United Nations, the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights, the International Court of Justice, the International Criminal Court, the globalist version of environmental education, and opposition to English as our official language.

Remember, your tax payer dollars and mine are at work here.

9 Responses

  1. Of course the NEA ‘knows best’ and if you weren’t a neanderthal ;-) Bookworm, you’d be in complete agreement with their agenda.

    How else is the country/world going to be ‘educated’ into grasping the ‘advanced’ understanding that the NEA has achieved?

    They just have your childrens best interests at heart and if that means a few generations parental ‘rights’ have to be usurped, well, the end justifies the means

  2. The fundamental law behind American education is parental control of a child’s upbringing. No court (see below) can rightfully abrogate such.

    Why have parents surrendered that control?

    —excerpt from Ms. Schafly:

    ‘After reading the NEA resolutions and policies, parents should reflect on last year’s decision of the U.S 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Fields v. Palmdale School District. The court ruled that parents’ fundamental right to control the upbringing of their children “does not extend beyond the threshold of the school door,” and that a public school has the right to provide its students with “whatever information it wishes to provide, sexual or otherwise.’

  3. Jg,

    The way I read the 9th courts ruling, ‘parental rights’ are no longer the “fundamental law behind American education”.

    The 9th court is not the final arbiter of course but of neccessity, in a public school setting, individual ‘parental rights’ must of neccessity yeild to the ‘general consensus’ of what is appropriate to teach children. The problem of course is that the NEA is attempting to ursurp the general consensus, to a personal/group agenda.

    As the dispute progresses, focusing the argument into the issue of ‘parental rights’ is I believe, a self-defeating tactic. It is the NEA’s attempting to ursurp ‘powers’ not delegated to them where the issue should be joined.

  4. If the “general consensus” thinks “necessity” has two Cs in it, perhaps its power should be usurped.
    In fact, the worst thing that parents can do is yield to a “general consensus”. Remember what the general consensus about slavery was in Virginia in 1800.

  5. DBrit, thanks for your comment. I have (as should most Americans) my own ideas about the nature of education. The ultimate authority always remains the parent. He may delegate his power to the schools.

    I see your point about ‘general consensus,’ which, of course, has meant at times in the past, the ‘consensus of the local community.’

    Today public schools no longer belong to their communities, nor to the parents.

    Lacking parental authority or local control, public schools may well be invalid, I might argue.

    I see us acceding here, and elsewhere, to the vile proposition that children must be treated as chattels of the state. A proposition historically abhorrent to any American.

  6. Trish,

    Please forgive the nearly unforgivable. There is never any reason for human error, it should be stamped out ruthlessly.

    Of course I agree with your implication that such an error completely invalidates my reasoning. Perhaps Bookworm will be kind enough to remove my post. It’s the least she can do, don’t you agree?

    General consensus, indeed!

    We should just have individual instruction in every public school, so that each parents views are fully supported.

    How the teachers are going to keep it all straight as they interact with all the different requirements of the individual parental views…

    And what the teachers are going to do when the mother and father don’t agree is going to be really hard to figure out…

  7. Mistakes shouldn’t be white washed out. That’s a trick the media keeps using, that annoys a lot of people.

  8. “Mistakes shouldn’t be white washed out. “Ymarsaker

    You’re right, Ymar!

    My shame at missing a typo should be left for everyone to see. Might I suggest the removal of the offending finger as an object lesson to others?

    Trish,

    I was NOT trying to use some ‘media’ trick! Please believe me!

  9. Getting a little testy there, beinhart?

    As Neo phrased it, honesty in blogging is if you make a mistake, you add the corrections to the bottom, instead of deleting posts/sites and what not as the Democrats/Daily Kos do constantly with their websites and blogs.

    Even with user editing, if it is a change of substance, it should be noted separately. It would be extreme for anyone to favor deleting their post because of a typo, so Brit should not be engaging in extremist rhetoric here.

Leave a Reply